meetingminutes/2021/20210527.md

---
title: Meeting Minutes 2021-05-27
date: 2021-05-27
attendees:
  - timansell,google
  - paullecocq,ibm
  - timpearson,raptor
  - toshaanbharvani,vantosh
  - michaelgielda,antmicro
  - alexeystepanov,yadro
  - lancealbertson,oregonstateuniversity
  - billflynn,ibm
  - paulmackerras,ibm
  - toddrosedahl,ibm
  - stevenroberts,ibm
  - jameskulina,openpowerfoundation
  - zevweiss,equinix
  - mendyfurmanek,ibm
  - michaelneuling,ibm
  - arjunnaj,tataconsultancy
  - mytroung,equinix
  - michalzygowski,3mdeb
  - karolgugala,antmicro
draft: false
---

# Call to order / Attendance

### Anti-trust Reminder
This is a reminder that all OpenPOWER Foundation activities are subject to strict compliance with the OpenPOWER Foundation’s Antitrust Guidelines.  Each individual participant and attendee at this meeting is responsible for knowing the contents of the Antitrust Guidelines, and for complying with the Antitrust Guidelines.  Copies of the Antitrust Guidelines are available at: Antitrust Guidelines in Google Drive or  Antitrust Guidelines OPF in OpenPOWER Foundation member area

## Workgroup Housekeeping
Review of voting members
Chair Nominations
Chair vote
Reminder of workgroup collaboration tools 
Last Meeting Follow-up
New Business
Git Repository Structure Discussion
Nominations for Maintainers
Vote for maintainers
Core strategy
Discussion on what components are needed on FPGA
Discussion on open tools to use
Open Items document
First milestones and actions


Minutes
Call to order / Attendance
Anti-trust Reminder
Workgroup Housekeeping
Review of voting members
Chair Nominations
Paul Lecocq, IBM
Tim Pearson, Raptor
Call for additional nominations - none
Chair vote
Tim Ansell, Google - Paul Lecocq (IBM)
Paul Lecocq, IBM - Paul Lecocq (IBM)
Tim Pearson, Raptor - Timothy Pearson (Raptor)
Toshaan Bharvani, VanTosh - Paul Lecocq (IBM)
Michael Gielda, Antmicro - Paul Lecocq (IBM)
Alexey Stepanov, Yadro - Timothy Pearson (Raptor)
Lance Albertson, Oregon State - Paul Lecocq (IBM)
Reminder of workgroup collaboration tools         
Slack / IRC
https://openpowerfoundation.slack.com/archives/C01UVKFKUQY
#librebmc on libera / freenode (namespace)
https://chat.openpower.foundation/opf/channels/librebmc 
Google Drive
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1p7YL3urCf4NtYbJTRxXDluytmMotUwty
OPF Discuss
https://discuss.openpower.foundation/c/sig/librebmc/11 
GIT repository
https://git.openpower.foundation/librebmc/librebmc 
Will be mirrored to gh and gl
Larger shared storage area to save meeting recordings
Files.openpower.foundation
Last Meeting Follow-up
New Business
Git Repository Structure Discussion
https://git.openpower.foundation/librebmc/librebmc 
https://git.openpower.foundation/librebmc/librebmc-gateware
Can we just call this gateware ?
Scratch places for OpenBMC / LSB
Nominations for Maintainers
Vote for maintainers (unanimity)
Tim Ansel (Google)
Tim Pearson (Raptor)
Karol Gugala (Antmicro)
Toshaan Bharvani (VanTosh)
Core strategy
Multiple cores using LiteX wrappers
Need to define core interface so cores can selected at build time
Discussion on what components are needed on FPGA
What exists
What needs to be designed
See document LibreBMC open items for now
Discussion on open tools to use


Open Items document
Need to convert to github issues
https://git.openpower.foundation/librebmc/librebmc
Use this for issues for the overall project
First milestones and actions
Need to start getting content into git
License file
Apache V2 with hardware
Readme
Open Discussion
As we are targeting Artix7, are we planning to focus on open tools, Symbiflow
Answer is yes, use open source tools first
Only allow upstream of designs that do not break open source tooling until the open sourcing tools
Need CICD pipeline that is common and accessible
Need to figure out where to host this, what resources
Raptor could volunteer some
OpenPOWER will host front end
OSU open source lab
Action Items
Need lower resource core to replace microwatt in the future
Need to be FPGA optimized
Work streams
Core optimization for FPGA


Start document of links to tools and hardware for others to replicate work.


http://j.mp/openfpga-diagram 


https://symbiflow.readthedocs.io/en/latest/toolchain-desc/design-flow.html 

https://symbiflow-examples.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building-examples.html#linux-litex-demo 

https://hdl.github.io/containers/#_graphs 


Diagram of all open tools, how they fit together, what is missing, what needs significant improvement - FuseSoc, OpenLane, Symbiflow, Yosys, openroads, etc https://github.com/hdl      
EDA Tooling - Containers - https://github.com/hdl/containers
Make sure these support Power. I believe that Rob Taylor added Power support.
EDA Tooling - Conda - https://hdl.github.io/containers/

EDA Tooling - if you are a Bazel fan;
https://github.com/hdl/bazel_rules_hdl
Used by Google’s XLS team -> http://github.com/google/xls

 Add current projects that you are working on that relate to LibreBMC or opentools.  Plan would be to schedule presentations on them to stir conversation and collaboration.  This will highlight areas where technical issues can be worked across projects.


Next Meeting Agenda Items

Future topics
Arjun to present
Tim Pearson to give update on where Raptor is going with Kestrel


WEBEX CHAT HISTORY:
from Toshaan Bharvani (External) to Everyone:    10:03  AM
Anybody coming in late, please note that this meeting is being recordered
from Lance Albertson (External) to Everyone:    10:07  AM
Are you able to hear me?
from Timothy Pearson (External) to Everyone:    10:07  AM
No
from Lance Albertson (External) to Everyone:    10:07  AM
Let me reconnect my audio
from Tim 'mithro' Ansell (External) to Everyone:    10:09  AM
Paul: Can you put a link to do doc here?
from Paul Lecocq (IBM) to Everyone:    10:09  AM
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15wC51JWJl5HOjijP8mmfvUtvws5RQaVZDgI8TvTqr9c/edit#
from Paul Lecocq (IBM) to Everyone:    10:16  AM
Slack / IRC
https://openpowerfoundation.slack.com/archives/C01UVKFKUQY
#librebmc on libera / freenode (namespace)
https://chat.openpower.foundation/opf/channels/librebmc 
Google Drive
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1p7YL3urCf4NtYbJTRxXDluytmMotUwty
OPF Discuss
https://discuss.openpower.foundation/c/sig/librebmc/11 
GIT repository
https://git.openpower.foundation/librebmc/librebmc 
Larger shared storage area to save meeting recordings
Files.openpower.foundation
from Alexey Stepanov YADRO (External) to Everyone:    10:19  AM
kind of welcome thread, good idea!
from Alexander Amelkin [YADRO] (External) to Everyone:    10:19  AM
OpenBMC has moved from FreeNode to Discord. Did you consider moving there as well?
from Toshaan Bharvani (External) to Everyone:    10:22  AM
No, I did not, I will need to look into Discord, I did consider OFTC and we do have a channel there, but not official
from Timothy Pearson (External) to Everyone:    10:23  AM
Discord requires people either run a binary on their machine (no open source client) or keep a Web browser open.  On this side, it has the same issues as Slack without significant advantages
from Timothy Pearson (External) to Everyone:    10:24  AM
In our experience, there's a lot of the dev community prefers IRC or mailing list, and if not then Github or similar where the Web tooling is designed for asynchronous work
from Alexander Amelkin [YADRO] (External) to Everyone:    10:27  AM
I understand this point. However, I personally think IRC is completely obsolete in 2021, and the only way to more or less efficiently use it is connecting to it via Matrix / Riot, which also imlies running a binary. :)
from Timothy Pearson (External) to Everyone:    10:28  AM
If it's a matter of functionality, there's also open source options for the more centralized model. :)
from Timothy Pearson (External) to Everyone:    10:29  AM
e.g. Mattermost
from Toshaan Bharvani (External) to Everyone:    10:29  AM
We want to maintain an IRC solution and we have mattermost also on chat.openpower.foundation
from Timothy Pearson (External) to Everyone:    10:30  AM
yes, agreed
from Timothy Pearson (External) to Everyone:    10:30  AM
just saying I don't want things to move in a direction that requires proprietary clients for effective collaboration.
from Timothy Pearson (External) to Everyone:    10:31  AM
appreciate all the integration work toshaan!
from Toshaan Bharvani (External) to Everyone:    10:32  AM
I do not know Discord, I will look at it just for informational purposes
from Alexander Amelkin [YADRO] (External) to Everyone:    10:32  AM
Why do we need that scratch space for OpenBMC ? OpenBMC uses Gerrit Review, which can (and does) effectively serve as a scratch space.
from Toshaan Bharvani (External) to Everyone:    10:33  AM
for staging new functions and checking compatibility
from Alexander Amelkin [YADRO] (External) to Everyone:    10:34  AM
I'm just worried that we could end up like Intel with their Intel-BMC that diverges quite significantly from OpenBMC and is rarely merged back.
from Timothy Pearson (External) to Everyone:    10:35  AM
That's always a concern if a primary goal isn't to upstream the work on a regular basis.  It's something we've had to struggle with as well; the only solution to it is resources that are available and ready / willing to quickly rewrite any of the new code to upstream's expectations or desires.
from Timothy Pearson (External) to Everyone:    10:36  AM
Basically, we can either move fast and break things (add functionality rapidly) or move at the speed of upstream merges.
from Timothy Pearson (External) to Everyone:    10:36  AM
So which one is the primary goal? :)
from Toshaan Bharvani (External) to Everyone:    10:37  AM
No, we will monitor that
from Alexander Amelkin [YADRO] (External) to Everyone:    10:38  AM
I guess, unless we set up a policy for upstreaming our changes from "the scratch" on a regular basis, we will inevitably diverge.
from Timothy Pearson (External) to Everyone:    10:39  AM
In our experience yes, and that would have to basically include a stop work until the merges are complete.  Maybe something like the Linux merge windows -- devs can keep additional changes local / out of staging, but no further changes / enhancements accepted that aren't directly related to upstreaming accepted until upstream merges?
from Toshaan Bharvani (External) to Everyone:    10:40  AM
Ok, we will document some policy around that
from Alexander Amelkin [YADRO] (External) to Everyone:    10:41  AM
Sounds good
from Alexander Amelkin [YADRO] (External) to Everyone:    10:50  AM
You're discussing some diagram, but I can't see any media shared. Is it just me?
from Toshaan Bharvani (External) to Everyone:    10:51  AM
That is in the google docs for the moment
from Alexander Amelkin [YADRO] (External) to Everyone:    10:52  AM
Oh, ok
from Karol Gugala (External) to Everyone:    11:00  AM
I have to switch to another meeting
from Karol Gugala (External) to Everyone:    11:00  AM
bye
from Michael (External) to Everyone:    11:01  AM
Need to run too...