New Issue

Interfaces added for ISA 3.0 should be so designated #44

Closed

opened by wschmidt-ibm · 0 comments

wschmidt-ibm commented (Migrated from github.com)

In the original document, these were tagged as POWER9 in column 1 in Table 6.9 and in the appendices. In the revised document, they've been removed. We should put them back, but instead of "POWER9" we should call them "POWER ISA 3.0" or just "ISA 3.0."

In the original document, these were tagged as POWER9 in column 1 in Table 6.9 and in the appendices. In the revised document, they've been removed. We should put them back, but instead of "POWER9" we should call them "POWER ISA 3.0" or just "ISA 3.0."

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Label

No Milestone

No project

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Loading…

There is no content yet.