|
|
|
library ieee;
|
|
|
|
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
|
|
|
|
use ieee.numeric_std.all;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
library work;
|
|
|
|
use work.common.all;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entity cr_file is
|
|
|
|
generic (
|
|
|
|
SIM : boolean := false;
|
|
|
|
-- Non-zero to enable log data collection
|
|
|
|
LOG_LENGTH : natural := 0
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
port(
|
|
|
|
clk : in std_logic;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d_in : in Decode2ToCrFileType;
|
|
|
|
d_out : out CrFileToDecode2Type;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
w_in : in WritebackToCrFileType;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- debug
|
|
|
|
sim_dump : in std_ulogic;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
log_out : out std_ulogic_vector(12 downto 0)
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
end entity cr_file;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
architecture behaviour of cr_file is
|
|
|
|
signal crs : std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0) := (others => '0');
|
Add basic XER support
The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of
the other XER fields.
This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly
used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32).
The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate
module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate
SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits.
We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to)
and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in
writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be
updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't
yet implement them).
To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This
assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div)
are running single issue for now.
One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction
in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback
latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value,
thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value.
I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct
but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that
stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal
tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute.
Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx.
[paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of
arguments to set_ov]
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
|
|
|
signal crs_updated : std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0);
|
|
|
|
signal xerc : xer_common_t := xerc_init;
|
|
|
|
signal xerc_updated : xer_common_t;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
|
|
cr_create_0: process(all)
|
|
|
|
variable hi, lo : integer := 0;
|
|
|
|
variable cr_tmp : std_ulogic_vector(31 downto 0) := (others => '0');
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
|
|
cr_tmp := crs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for i in 0 to 7 loop
|
|
|
|
if w_in.write_cr_mask(i) = '1' then
|
|
|
|
lo := i*4;
|
|
|
|
hi := lo + 3;
|
|
|
|
cr_tmp(hi downto lo) := w_in.write_cr_data(hi downto lo);
|
|
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crs_updated <= cr_tmp;
|
Add basic XER support
The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of
the other XER fields.
This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly
used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32).
The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate
module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate
SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits.
We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to)
and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in
writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be
updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't
yet implement them).
To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This
assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div)
are running single issue for now.
One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction
in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback
latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value,
thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value.
I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct
but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that
stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal
tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute.
Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx.
[paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of
arguments to set_ov]
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if w_in.write_xerc_enable = '1' then
|
|
|
|
xerc_updated <= w_in.write_xerc_data;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
xerc_updated <= xerc;
|
|
|
|
end if;
|
Add basic XER support
The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of
the other XER fields.
This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly
used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32).
The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate
module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate
SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits.
We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to)
and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in
writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be
updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't
yet implement them).
To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This
assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div)
are running single issue for now.
One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction
in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback
latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value,
thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value.
I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct
but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that
stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal
tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute.
Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx.
[paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of
arguments to set_ov]
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
end process;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- synchronous writes
|
|
|
|
cr_write_0: process(clk)
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
|
|
if rising_edge(clk) then
|
|
|
|
if w_in.write_cr_enable = '1' then
|
|
|
|
report "Writing " & to_hstring(w_in.write_cr_data) & " to CR mask " & to_hstring(w_in.write_cr_mask);
|
|
|
|
crs <= crs_updated;
|
|
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if w_in.write_xerc_enable = '1' then
|
Add basic XER support
The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of
the other XER fields.
This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly
used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32).
The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate
module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate
SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits.
We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to)
and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in
writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be
updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't
yet implement them).
To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This
assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div)
are running single issue for now.
One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction
in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback
latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value,
thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value.
I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct
but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that
stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal
tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute.
Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx.
[paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of
arguments to set_ov]
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
|
|
|
report "Writing XERC";
|
|
|
|
xerc <= xerc_updated;
|
|
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
end process;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- asynchronous reads
|
|
|
|
cr_read_0: process(all)
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
|
|
-- just return the entire CR to make mfcrf easier for now
|
|
|
|
if d_in.read = '1' then
|
|
|
|
report "Reading CR " & to_hstring(crs_updated);
|
|
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
d_out.read_cr_data <= crs_updated;
|
Add basic XER support
The carry is currently internal to execute1. We don't handle any of
the other XER fields.
This creates type called "xer_common_t" that contains the commonly
used XER bits (CA, CA32, SO, OV, OV32).
The value is stored in the CR file (though it could be a separate
module). The rest of the bits will be implemented as a separate
SPR and the two parts reconciled in mfspr/mtspr in latter commits.
We always read XER in decode2 (there is little point not to)
and send it down all pipeline branches as it will be needed in
writeback for all type of instructions when CR0:SO needs to be
updated (such forms exist for all pipeline branches even if we don't
yet implement them).
To avoid having to track XER hazards, we forward it back in EX1. This
assumes that other pipeline branches that can modify it (mult and div)
are running single issue for now.
One additional hazard to beware of is an XER:SO modifying instruction
in EX1 followed immediately by a store conditional. Due to our writeback
latency, the store will go down the LSU with the previous XER value,
thus the stcx. will set CR0:SO using an obsolete SO value.
I doubt there exist any code relying on this behaviour being correct
but we should account for it regardless, possibly by ensuring that
stcx. remain single issue initially, or later by adding some minimal
tracking or moving the LSU into the same pipeline as execute.
Missing some obscure XER affecting instructions like addex or mcrxrx.
[paulus@ozlabs.org - fix CA32 and OV32 for OP_ADD, fix order of
arguments to set_ov]
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
5 years ago
|
|
|
d_out.read_xerc_data <= xerc_updated;
|
|
|
|
end process;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sim_dump_test: if SIM generate
|
|
|
|
dump_cr: process(all)
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
|
|
if sim_dump = '1' then
|
|
|
|
report "CR 00000000" & to_hstring(crs);
|
|
|
|
assert false report "end of test" severity failure;
|
|
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
end process;
|
|
|
|
end generate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cf_log: if LOG_LENGTH > 0 generate
|
|
|
|
signal log_data : std_ulogic_vector(12 downto 0);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
|
|
cr_log: process(clk)
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
|
|
if rising_edge(clk) then
|
|
|
|
log_data <= w_in.write_cr_enable &
|
|
|
|
w_in.write_cr_data(31 downto 28) &
|
|
|
|
w_in.write_cr_mask;
|
|
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
end process;
|
|
|
|
log_out <= log_data;
|
|
|
|
end generate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
end architecture behaviour;
|