divider: Reduce delay in detecting 32-bit overflow

Timing analysis showed that even with the output register, timing
was still a bit tight in the output stage, where the carry has to
propagate all the way through the 64-bit negater, and we were then
testing the top 33 bits to determine if a 32-bit operation had
overflowed.

Instead of detecting overflow at the end, we watch for any 1
bits getting shifted into the top 32 bits of the quotient register
as we are doing the division.  That is relatively easy to do and
simplifies the output stage.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
jtag-port
Paul Mackerras 5 years ago
parent c7025f9f28
commit 82c19d4e7a

@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ architecture behaviour of divider is
signal rc : std_ulogic;
signal write_reg : std_ulogic_vector(4 downto 0);
signal overflow : std_ulogic;
signal ovf32 : std_ulogic;
signal did_ovf : std_ulogic;
signal cr_data : std_ulogic_vector(2 downto 0);

@ -66,6 +67,7 @@ begin
count <= "1111111";
running <= '1';
overflow <= '0';
ovf32 <= '0';
signcheck <= d_in.is_signed and (d_in.dividend(63) or d_in.divisor(63));
elsif signcheck = '1' then
signcheck <= '0';
@ -86,16 +88,19 @@ begin
end if;
overflow <= quot(63);
if dend(128) = '1' or unsigned(dend(127 downto 64)) >= div then
ovf32 <= ovf32 or quot(31);
dend <= std_ulogic_vector(unsigned(dend(127 downto 64)) - div) &
dend(63 downto 0) & '0';
quot <= quot(62 downto 0) & '1';
count <= count + 1;
elsif dend(128 downto 57) = x"000000000000000000" and count(6 downto 3) /= "0111" then
-- consume 8 bits of zeroes in one cycle
ovf32 <= or (ovf32 & quot(31 downto 24));
dend <= dend(120 downto 0) & x"00";
quot <= quot(55 downto 0) & x"00";
count <= count + 8;
else
ovf32 <= ovf32 or quot(31);
dend <= dend(127 downto 0) & '0';
quot <= quot(62 downto 0) & '0';
count <= count + 1;
@ -125,13 +130,11 @@ begin
if is_32bit = '0' then
did_ovf <= overflow or (is_signed and (sresult(63) xor neg_result));
elsif is_signed = '1' then
if overflow = '1' or
(sresult(63 downto 31) /= x"00000000" & '0' and
sresult(63 downto 31) /= x"ffffffff" & '1') then
if ovf32 = '1' or sresult(32) /= sresult(31) then
did_ovf <= '1';
end if;
else
did_ovf <= overflow or (or (sresult(63 downto 32)));
did_ovf <= ovf32;
end if;
if did_ovf = '1' then
oresult <= (others => '0');

Loading…
Cancel
Save