Fix improper statement about CR save word in 2.3.8

Fixes #86.

Signed-off-by: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
master
Bill Schmidt 5 years ago
parent 8e81b272b0
commit 35d0517410

@ -8704,8 +8704,11 @@ addi r3,r1,p ; R3 = new data area following parameter save area.</pro
<para>Because it is allowed (and common) to return without first <para>Because it is allowed (and common) to return without first
deallocating this dynamically allocated memory, all the linkage deallocating this dynamically allocated memory, all the linkage
information in the new location must be valid. Therefore, it is also information in the new location must be valid. Therefore, it is also
necessary to copy the CR save word and the TOC pointer doubleword from necessary to copy the <phrase revisionflag="deleted">CR save
their old locations to the new. It is not necessary to copy the LR save word and the</phrase> TOC pointer doubleword from <phrase
revisionflag="deleted">their old locations</phrase> <phrase
revisionflag="added">its old location</phrase> to the new. It is
not necessary to copy the LR save
doubleword because, until this function makes a call, it does not contain doubleword because, until this function makes a call, it does not contain
a value that needs to be preserved. In the future, if it is defined and a value that needs to be preserved. In the future, if it is defined and
if the function uses the Reserved word, the LR save doubleword must also if the function uses the Reserved word, the LR save doubleword must also

Loading…
Cancel
Save