The current code has the possibility that we could set reg_addr
or reg_ctrl and then increment reg_addr in the same cycle, resulting
in some long timing paths. Rearrange the code to make it clear
that we are not trying to add an auto-increment to data from
outside the module; in any given cycle we either set one of
reg_addr and reg_ctrl, or we possibly increment reg_addr.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Since the condition setting got moved to writeback, execute2 does
nothing aside from wasting a cycle. This removes it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
This makes the exts[bhw] instructions do the sign extension in the
writeback stage using the sign-extension logic there instead of
having unique sign extension logic in execute1. This requires
passing the data length and sign extend flag from decode2 down
through execute1 and execute2 and into writeback. As a side bonus
we reduce the number of values in insn_type_t by two.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
This adds code to writeback to format data and test the result
against zero for the purpose of setting CR0. The data formatter
is able to shift and mask by bytes and do byte reversal and sign
extension. It can also put together bytes from two input
doublewords to support unaligned loads (including unaligned
byte-reversed loads).
The data formatter starts with an 8:1 multiplexer that is able
to direct any byte of the input to any byte of the output. This
lets us rotate the data and simultaneously byte-reverse it.
The rotated/reversed data goes to a register for the unaligned
cases that overlap two doublewords. Then there is per-byte logic
that does trimming, sign extension, and splicing together bytes
from a previous input doubleword (stored in data_latched) and the
current doubleword. Finally the 64-bit result is tested to set
CR0 if rc = 1.
This removes the RC logic from the execute2, multiply and divide
units, and the shift/mask/byte-reverse/sign-extend logic from
loadstore2.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
We have all the machinery in place to implement the neg instruction
as OP_ADD. Doing that means we can ditch OP_NEG, and saves about
66 slice LUTs on the A7-100.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Timing analysis showed that even with the output register, timing
was still a bit tight in the output stage, where the carry has to
propagate all the way through the 64-bit negater, and we were then
testing the top 33 bits to determine if a 32-bit operation had
overflowed.
Instead of detecting overflow at the end, we watch for any 1
bits getting shifted into the top 32 bits of the quotient register
as we are doing the division. That is relatively easy to do and
simplifies the output stage.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
This puts the output of the divider through a register. With the
addition of the logic to detect overflow, the combinatorial output
logic of the divider was becoming a critical path. Adding the
output register adds a cycle to the latency of the divider but
helps make timing at 100MHz on the A7-100.
This also makes the valid, write_reg_enable and write_cr_enable
fields of the output be registered, which eliminates warnings
about register/latch pins with no clock.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Anything that isn't a load or store and anything that doesn't read the
CR can go as soon as its inputs are ready.
While we could also allow SPR read/write and carry read/write, we plan
to change them to be read in decode2 and written in writeback soon and
they will need separate hazard detection to be added.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@linux.ibm.com>
Check GPRs against any writers in the pipeline.
All instructions are still marked single in pipeline at
this stage.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@linux.ibm.com>
By using 4:1 multiplexers rather than 2:1, this cuts the number of
levels of multiplexing from 4 to 2 and also reduces the total number
of slice LUTs required. Because we are now handling 4 bits at each
level, including the bottom level, the logic to do the priority
encoding can be factored out into a function that is used at each
level.
This rearranges the logic so that the encoding and selection of bits
is done whether or not the input operand is zero, and the if statement
testing whether the input is zero only affects what is assigned to
result. With this we don't get the inferred latches and we can go
back to using signals rather than variables.
Also add some comments about what is being done.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
The shared variable used for FIFO memory is not VHDL 2008 compliant.
I can't see why it needs to be a shared variable since reads and writes
update top and bottom synchronously, meaning they don't need same cycle
access to the FIFO memory.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@linux.ibm.com>
This adds logic to detect the cases where the quotient of the
division overflows the range of the output representation, and
return all zeroes in those cases, which is what POWER9 does.
To do this, we extend the dividend register by 1 bit and we do
an extra step in the division process to get a 2^64 bit of the
quotient, which ends up in the 'overflow' signal. This catches all
the cases where dividend >= 2^64 * divisor, including the case
where divisor = 0, and the divde/divdeu cases where |RA| >= |RB|.
Then, in the output stage, we also check that the result fits in
the representable range, which depends on whether the division is
a signed division or not, and whether it is a 32-bit or 64-bit
division. If dividend >= 2^64 or the result doesn't fit in the
representable range, write_data is set to 0 and write_cr_data to
0x20000000 (i.e. cr0.eq = 1).
POWER9 sets the top 32 bits of the result to zero for 32-bit signed
divisions, and sets CR0 when RC=1 according to the 64-bit value
(i.e. CR0.LT is always 0 for 32-bit signed divisions, even if the
32-bit result is negative). However, modsw with a negative result
sets the top 32 bits to all 1s. We follow suit.
This updates divider_tb to check the invalid cases as well as the
valid case.
This also fixes a small bug where the reset signal for the divider
was driven from rst when it should have been driven from core_rst.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
outstanding can only ever be -1 to 2 at the moment (0 or 1 on a
rising clock edge). Vivado is synthesizing a much wider adder
which is silly. Constrain it with a range statement. This should
be good for timing and saves us about 85 LUTs.
This will get relaxed when we add more pipelining, but only by a
few bits.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@linux.ibm.com>
The current code simulates correctly, but produces miscompares when synthesized
onto an FPGA. On closer inspection GHDL synthesis complains about inferred
latches and there does seem to be issues.
Convert it to variables that are always initialized to zero at the start of the
process.
Fixes: 24a4a796ce ("execute: Consolidate count-leading/trailing-zeroes implementations")
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@linux.ibm.com>
Paul Mackerras
Anton Blanchard
Michael Neuling